OpenSSH through 10.0, when common types of DRAM are used, might allow row hammer attacks (for authentication bypass) because the integer value of authenticated in mm_answer_authpassword does not resist flips of a single bit. NOTE: this is applicable to a certain threat model of attacker-victim co-location in which the attacker has user privileges. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier, who states "we do not consider it to be the application's responsibility to defend against platform architectural weaknesses."
Metrics
Affected Vendors & Products
References
History
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:45:00 +0000
Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
---|---|---|
Description | OpenSSH through 9.6, when common types of DRAM are used, might allow row hammer attacks (for authentication bypass) because the integer value of authenticated in mm_answer_authpassword does not resist flips of a single bit. NOTE: this is applicable to a certain threat model of attacker-victim co-location in which the attacker has user privileges. | OpenSSH through 10.0, when common types of DRAM are used, might allow row hammer attacks (for authentication bypass) because the integer value of authenticated in mm_answer_authpassword does not resist flips of a single bit. NOTE: this is applicable to a certain threat model of attacker-victim co-location in which the attacker has user privileges. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier, who states "we do not consider it to be the application's responsibility to defend against platform architectural weaknesses." |
References |
|

Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: mitre
Published: 2023-12-24T00:00:00.000Z
Updated: 2025-09-22T16:42:44.854Z
Reserved: 2023-12-24T00:00:00.000Z
Link: CVE-2023-51767

No data.

Status : Modified
Published: 2023-12-24T07:15:07.410
Modified: 2025-09-22T17:16:06.300
Link: CVE-2023-51767
