Total
529 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-33074 | 2025-05-06 | 7.5 High | ||
| Improper verification of cryptographic signature in Microsoft Azure Functions allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2018-2790 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 3 more | 17 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Xp7 Command View and 14 more | 2025-05-06 | 3.1 Low |
| Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Security). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 6u181, 7u171, 8u162 and 10; Java SE Embedded: 8u161. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Java SE, Java SE Embedded accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.0 Base Score 3.1 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2022-3322 | 1 Cloudflare | 1 Warp Mobile Client | 2025-05-05 | 6.7 Medium |
| Lock Warp switch is a feature of Zero Trust platform which, when enabled, prevents users of enrolled devices from disabling WARP client. Due to insufficient policy verification by WARP iOS client, this feature could be bypassed by using the "Disable WARP" quick action. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38069 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 9 more | 2025-05-05 | 7 High |
| Windows Enroll Engine Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000338 | 4 Bouncycastle, Canonical, Netapp and 1 more | 6 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Ubuntu Linux, 7-mode Transition Tool and 3 more | 2025-05-05 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21383 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2025-05-03 | 3.3 Low |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-26228 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-05-03 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Cryptographic Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-26194 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 8 more | 2025-05-03 | 7.4 High |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-41669 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Ecostruxure Operator Terminal Expert, Pro-face Blue | 2025-05-02 | 7 High |
| A CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability exists in the SGIUtility component that allows adversaries with local user privileges to load a malicious DLL which could result in execution of malicious code. Affected Products: EcoStruxure Operator Terminal Expert(V3.3 Hotfix 1 or prior), Pro-face BLUE(V3.3 Hotfix1 or prior). | ||||
| CVE-2022-41666 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Ecostruxure Operator Terminal Expert, Pro-face Blue | 2025-05-02 | 7 High |
| A CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability exists that allows adversaries with local user privileges to load a malicious DLL which could lead to execution of malicious code. Affected Products: EcoStruxure Operator Terminal Expert(V3.3 Hotfix 1 or prior), Pro-face BLUE(V3.3 Hotfix1 or prior). | ||||
| CVE-2021-26391 | 1 Amd | 98 Enterprise Driver, Radeon Pro Software, Radeon Pro W5500 and 95 more | 2025-05-01 | 7.8 High |
| Insufficient verification of multiple header signatures while loading a Trusted Application (TA) may allow an attacker with privileges to gain code execution in that TA or the OS/kernel. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4807 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-05-01 | 7.8 High |
| Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue. As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap: OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000 The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24043 | 2025-04-29 | 7.5 High | ||
| Improper verification of cryptographic signature in .NET allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2764 | 2025-04-29 | N/A | ||
| CarlinKit CPC200-CCPA update.cgi Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of CarlinKit CPC200-CCPA devices. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the handling of update packages provided to update.cgi. The issue results from the lack of proper verification of a cryptographic signature. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-24355. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2763 | 2025-04-29 | N/A | ||
| CarlinKit CPC200-CCPA Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of CarlinKit CPC200-CCPA devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of update packages on USB drives. The issue results from the lack of proper verification of a cryptographic signature. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-24356. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2866 | 2025-04-29 | 2.8 Low | ||
| Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in LibreOffice allows PDF Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation. In the affected versions of LibreOffice a flaw in the verification code for adbe.pkcs7.sha1 signatures could cause invalid signatures to be accepted as valid This issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.8 before < 24.8.6, from 25.2 before < 25.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23655 | 1 Octobercms | 1 October | 2025-04-23 | 4.8 Medium |
| Octobercms is a self-hosted CMS platform based on the Laravel PHP Framework. Affected versions of OctoberCMS did not validate gateway server signatures. As a result non-authoritative gateway servers may be used to exfiltrate user private keys. Users are advised to upgrade their installations to build 474 or v1.1.10. The only known workaround is to manually apply the patch (e3b455ad587282f0fbcb7763c6d9c3d000ca1e6a) which adds server signature validation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23610 | 1 Wire | 1 Wire-server | 2025-04-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| wire-server provides back end services for Wire, an open source messenger. In versions of wire-server prior to the 2022-01-27 release, it was possible to craft DSA Signatures to bypass SAML SSO and impersonate any Wire user with SAML credentials. In teams with SAML, but without SCIM, it was possible to create new accounts with fake SAML credentials. Under certain conditions that can be established by an attacker, an upstream library for parsing, rendering, signing, and validating SAML XML data was accepting public keys as trusted that were provided by the attacker in the signature. As a consequence, the attacker could login as any user in any Wire team with SAML SSO enabled. If SCIM was not enabled, the attacker could also create new users with new SAML NameIDs. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the attacker needs to know the SSO login code (distributed to all team members with SAML credentials and visible in the Team Management app), the SAML EntityID identifying the IdP (a URL not considered sensitive, but usually hard to guess, also visible in Team Management), and the SAML NameID of the user (usually an email address or a nick). The issue has been fixed in wire-server `2022-01-27` and is already deployed on all Wire managed services. On premise instances of wire-server need to be updated to `2022-01-27`, so that their backends are no longer affected. There are currently no known workarounds. More detailed information about how to reproduce the vulnerability and mitigation strategies is available in the GitHub Security Advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24759 | 1 Chainsafe | 1 Js-libp2p-noise | 2025-04-23 | 8.1 High |
| `@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` contains TypeScript implementation of noise protocol, an encryption protocol used in libp2p. `@chainsafe/libp2p-noise` before 4.1.2 and 5.0.3 does not correctly validate signatures during the handshake process. This may allow a man-in-the-middle to pose as other peers and get those peers banned. Users should upgrade to version 4.1.2 or 5.0.3 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24771 | 2 Digitalbazaar, Redhat | 6 Forge, Acm, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-23 | 7.5 High |
| Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.3.0, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification code is lenient in checking the digest algorithm structure. This can allow a crafted structure that steals padding bytes and uses unchecked portion of the PKCS#1 encoded message to forge a signature when a low public exponent is being used. The issue has been addressed in `node-forge` version 1.3.0. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||