Filtered by vendor Postgresql
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Postgresql
Subscriptions
Total
166 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-39418 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-08-06 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in PostgreSQL with the use of the MERGE command, which fails to test new rows against row security policies defined for UPDATE and SELECT. If UPDATE and SELECT policies forbid some rows that INSERT policies do not forbid, a user could store such rows. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5870 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 22 Postgresql, Advanced Cluster Security, Codeready Linux Builder Eus and 19 more | 2025-08-06 | 2.2 Low |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL involving the pg_cancel_backend role that signals background workers, including the logical replication launcher, autovacuum workers, and the autovacuum launcher. Successful exploitation requires a non-core extension with a less-resilient background worker and would affect that specific background worker only. This issue may allow a remote high privileged user to launch a denial of service (DoS) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39417 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 10 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Advanced Cluster Security and 7 more | 2025-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| IN THE EXTENSION SCRIPT, a SQL Injection vulnerability was found in PostgreSQL if it uses @extowner@, @extschema@, or @extschema:...@ inside a quoting construct (dollar quoting, '', or ""). If an administrator has installed files of a vulnerable, trusted, non-bundled extension, an attacker with database-level CREATE privilege can execute arbitrary code as the bootstrap superuser. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5868 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 22 Postgresql, Advanced Cluster Security, Codeready Linux Builder Eus and 19 more | 2025-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| A memory disclosure vulnerability was found in PostgreSQL that allows remote users to access sensitive information by exploiting certain aggregate function calls with 'unknown'-type arguments. Handling 'unknown'-type values from string literals without type designation can disclose bytes, potentially revealing notable and confidential information. This issue exists due to excessive data output in aggregate function calls, enabling remote users to read some portion of system memory. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5869 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 27 Postgresql, Advanced Cluster Security, Codeready Linux Builder Eus and 24 more | 2025-08-01 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL that allows authenticated database users to execute arbitrary code through missing overflow checks during SQL array value modification. This issue exists due to an integer overflow during array modification where a remote user can trigger the overflow by providing specially crafted data. This enables the execution of arbitrary code on the target system, allowing users to write arbitrary bytes to memory and extensively read the server's memory. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0985 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 7 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-06-13 | 8 High |
| Late privilege drop in REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY in PostgreSQL allows an object creator to execute arbitrary SQL functions as the command issuer. The command intends to run SQL functions as the owner of the materialized view, enabling safe refresh of untrusted materialized views. The victim is a superuser or member of one of the attacker's roles. The attack requires luring the victim into running REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY on the attacker's materialized view. Versions before PostgreSQL 16.2, 15.6, 14.11, 13.14, and 12.18 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2454 | 3 Fedoraproject, Postgresql, Redhat | 9 Fedora, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-06-04 | 7.2 High |
| schema_element defeats protective search_path changes; It was found that certain database calls in PostgreSQL could permit an authed attacker with elevated database-level privileges to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4207 | 1 Postgresql | 1 Postgresql | 2025-05-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| Buffer over-read in PostgreSQL GB18030 encoding validation allows a database input provider to achieve temporary denial of service on platforms where a 1-byte over-read can elicit process termination. This affects the database server and also libpq. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.5, 16.9, 15.13, 14.18, and 13.21 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10976 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 2 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux | 2025-05-09 | 4.2 Medium |
| Incomplete tracking in PostgreSQL of tables with row security allows a reused query to view or change different rows from those intended. CVE-2023-2455 and CVE-2016-2193 fixed most interaction between row security and user ID changes. They missed cases where a subquery, WITH query, security invoker view, or SQL-language function references a table with a row-level security policy. This has the same consequences as the two earlier CVEs. That is to say, it leads to potentially incorrect policies being applied in cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. An attacker must tailor an attack to a particular application's pattern of query plan reuse, user ID changes, and role-specific row security policies. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24844 | 2 Gin-vue-admin Project, Postgresql | 2 Gin-vue-admin, Postgresql | 2025-04-22 | 8.1 High |
| Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin, which separates the front and rear of the full stack. The problem occurs in the following code in server/service/system/sys_auto_code_pgsql.go, which means that PostgreSQL must be used as the database for this vulnerability to occur. Users must: Require JWT login） and be using PostgreSQL to be affected. This issue has been resolved in version 2.5.1. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7486 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 5 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| PostgreSQL versions 8.4 - 9.6 are vulnerable to information leak in pg_user_mappings view which discloses foreign server passwords to any user having USAGE privilege on the associated foreign server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8806 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Postgresql | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Postgresql | 2025-04-20 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Debian pg_ctlcluster, pg_createcluster, and pg_upgradecluster scripts, as distributed in the Debian postgresql-common package before 181+deb9u1 for PostgreSQL (and other packages related to Debian and Ubuntu), handled symbolic links insecurely, which could result in local denial of service by overwriting arbitrary files. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15099 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE commands in PostgreSQL 10.x before 10.1, 9.6.x before 9.6.6, and 9.5.x before 9.5.10 disclose table contents that the invoker lacks privilege to read. These exploits affect only tables where the attacker lacks full read access but has both INSERT and UPDATE privileges. Exploits bypass row level security policies and lack of SELECT privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7547 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 3 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| PostgreSQL versions before 9.2.22, 9.3.18, 9.4.13, 9.5.8 and 9.6.4 are vulnerable to authorization flaw allowing remote authenticated attackers to retrieve passwords from the user mappings defined by the foreign server owners without actually having the privileges to do so. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7546 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| PostgreSQL versions before 9.2.22, 9.3.18, 9.4.13, 9.5.8 and 9.6.4 are vulnerable to incorrect authentication flaw allowing remote attackers to gain access to database accounts with an empty password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15098 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Invalid json_populate_recordset or jsonb_populate_recordset function calls in PostgreSQL 10.x before 10.1, 9.6.x before 9.6.6, 9.5.x before 9.5.10, 9.4.x before 9.4.15, and 9.3.x before 9.3.20 can crash the server or disclose a few bytes of server memory. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7484 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 5 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was found that some selectivity estimation functions in PostgreSQL before 9.2.21, 9.3.x before 9.3.17, 9.4.x before 9.4.12, 9.5.x before 9.5.7, and 9.6.x before 9.6.3 did not check user privileges before providing information from pg_statistic, possibly leaking information. An unprivileged attacker could use this flaw to steal some information from tables they are otherwise not allowed to access. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7548 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| PostgreSQL versions before 9.4.13, 9.5.8 and 9.6.4 are vulnerable to authorization flaw allowing remote authenticated attackers with no privileges on a large object to overwrite the entire contents of the object, resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0768 | 1 Postgresql | 1 Postgresql | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| PostgreSQL PL/Java after 9.0 does not honor access controls on large objects. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7485 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 3 Postgresql, Network Satellite, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In PostgreSQL 9.3.x before 9.3.17, 9.4.x before 9.4.12, 9.5.x before 9.5.7, and 9.6.x before 9.6.3, it was found that the PGREQUIRESSL environment variable was no longer enforcing a SSL/TLS connection to a PostgreSQL server. An active Man-in-the-Middle attacker could use this flaw to strip the SSL/TLS protection from a connection between a client and a server. | ||||