Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Satellite Capsule
Subscriptions
Total
282 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-28347 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28346 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 4 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0231 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Mina, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Handling of the close_notify SSL/TLS message does not lead to a connection closure, leading the server to retain the socket opened and to have the client potentially receive clear text messages afterward. Mitigation: 2.0.20 users should migrate to 2.0.21, 2.1.0 users should migrate to 2.1.1. This issue affects: Apache MINA. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16782 | 4 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Rack and 1 more | 6 Fedora, Leap, Rack and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| There's a possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability in Rack (RubyGem rack). This vulnerability is patched in versions 1.6.12 and 2.0.8. Attackers may be able to find and hijack sessions by using timing attacks targeting the session id. Session ids are usually stored and indexed in a database that uses some kind of scheme for speeding up lookups of that session id. By carefully measuring the amount of time it takes to look up a session, an attacker may be able to find a valid session id and hijack the session. The session id itself may be generated randomly, but the way the session is indexed by the backing store does not use a secure comparison. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27530 | 3 Debian, Rack, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Rack, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could allow an attacker to craft requests that can be abuse to cause multipart parsing to take longer than expected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44570 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 3 Rack, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A denial of service vulnerability in the Range header parsing component of Rack >= 1.5.0. A Carefully crafted input can cause the Range header parsing component in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that deal with Range requests (such as streaming applications, or applications that serve files) may be impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44572 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 3 Rack, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A denial of service vulnerability in the multipart parsing component of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1 and 3.0.0.1 could allow an attacker tocraft input that can cause RFC2183 multipart boundary parsing in Rack to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial of service attack vector. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtually all Rails applications) are impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44571 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 3 Rack, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsingcomponent of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1, 3.0.0.1. This could allow an attacker to craft an input that can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rackto take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial ofservice attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipartparsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtuallyall Rails applications) are impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56374 | 1 Redhat | 4 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-02-12 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.) | ||||
| CVE-2024-26130 | 2 Cryptography.io, Redhat | 5 Cryptography, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-02-05 | 7.5 High |
| cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. Starting in version 38.0.0 and prior to version 42.0.4, if `pkcs12.serialize_key_and_certificates` is called with both a certificate whose public key did not match the provided private key and an `encryption_algorithm` with `hmac_hash` set (via `PrivateFormat.PKCS12.encryption_builder().hmac_hash(...)`, then a NULL pointer dereference would occur, crashing the Python process. This has been resolved in version 42.0.4, the first version in which a `ValueError` is properly raised. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1894 | 2 Puppet, Redhat | 4 Puppet Enterprise, Puppet Server, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-01-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) issue was discovered in Puppet Server 7.9.2 certificate validation. An issue related to specifically crafted certificate names significantly slowed down server operations. | ||||
| CVE-2023-31047 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Fedora, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-01-29 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27539 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Logging, Rhel Eus and 2 more | 2025-01-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| There is a denial of service vulnerability in the header parsing component of Rack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7012 | 1 Redhat | 4 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Satellite Maintenance and 1 more | 2024-12-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability has been identified in Foreman when deployed with External Authentication, due to the puppet-foreman configuration. This issue arises from Apache's mod_proxy not properly unsetting headers because of restrictions on underscores in HTTP headers, allowing authentication through a malformed header. This flaw impacts all active Satellite deployments (6.13, 6.14 and 6.15) and could potentially enable unauthorized users to gain administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56326 | 1 Redhat | 14 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2024-12-27 | 7.8 High |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5189 | 1 Redhat | 7 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 4 more | 2024-12-06 | 6.3 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in Ansible when extracting tarballs. An attacker could craft a malicious tarball so that when using the galaxy importer of Ansible Automation Hub, a symlink could be dropped on the disk, resulting in files being overwritten. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40896 | 2 Pygments, Redhat | 4 Pygments, Ansible Automation Platform, Satellite and 1 more | 2024-11-27 | 5.5 Medium |
| A ReDoS issue was discovered in pygments/lexers/smithy.py in pygments through 2.15.0 via SmithyLexer. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11407 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2024-11-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| There exists a denial of service through Data corruption in gRPC-C++ - gRPC-C++ servers with transmit zero copy enabled through the channel arg GRPC_ARG_TCP_TX_ZEROCOPY_ENABLED can experience data corruption issues. The data sent by the application may be corrupted before transmission over the network thus leading the receiver to receive an incorrect set of bytes causing RPC requests to fail. We recommend upgrading past commit e9046b2bbebc0cb7f5dc42008f807f6c7e98e791 | ||||
| CVE-2019-12387 | 5 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 2 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Solaris and 5 more | 2024-11-25 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Twisted before 19.2.1, twisted.web did not validate or sanitize URIs or HTTP methods, allowing an attacker to inject invalid characters such as CRLF. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000111 | 2 Redhat, Twisted | 4 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 1 more | 2024-11-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| Twisted before 16.3.1 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. | ||||