Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscriptions
Total
7876 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-8915 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Mq | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM WebSphere MQ 8.0 could allow an authenticated user with access to the queue manager and queue, to deny service to other channels running under the same process. IBM Reference #: 1998649. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8916 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.5, 6.1-6.4, and 7.1 stores password information in a log file that could be read by a local user when a set password command is issued. IBM X-Force ID: 118472. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2976 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sametime | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sametime Meeting Server 8.5.2 and 9.0 could allow a meeting invitee to obtain previously cleared sensitive information by viewing the meeting report history. IBM X-Force ID: 113936. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0396 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager could allow a user under special circumstances to inject commands that would be executed with unnecessary higher privileges than expected. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8932 | 1 Ibm | 1 Kenexa Lms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Kenexa LMS on Cloud could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable server. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8933 | 1 Ibm | 1 Kenexa Lms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Kenexa LMS on Cloud could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request containing dot dot sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1256 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124678 | ||||
| CVE-2017-1254 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 124634. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8939 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (IBM Spectrum Protect 7.1 and 8.1) clients/agents store password information in the Windows Registry in a manner which can be compromised. IBM X-Force ID: 118790. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8941 | 1 Ibm | 2 Spectrum Control, Tivoli Storage Productivity Center | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1253 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 124633. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0382 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tealeaf Consumer Experience | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The IBM Tealeaf Consumer Experience 8.7, 8.8, and 9.0 portal exposes some of its operational state in a form that may be accidentally captured and exposed by network infrastructure components such as IIS. IBM X-Force ID: 112356. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8954 | 1 Ibm | 1 Dashdb Local | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM dashDB Local uses hard-coded credentials that could allow a remote attacker to gain access to the Docker container or database. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8962 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Inventory | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM BigFix Inventory 9.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 118851. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0355 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sametime | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sametime Enterprise Meeting Server 8.5.2 and 9.0 could allow an authenticated user that has been invited to a Sametime meeting room, to cause the screen sharing to cease through the use of cross-site request forgery. IBM X-Force ID: 111894. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8972 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Vios | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM AIX 6.1, 7.1, and 7.2 could allow a local user to gain root privileges using a specially crafted command within the bellmail client. IBM APARs: IV91006, IV91007, IV91008, IV91010, IV91011. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0354 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sametime | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sametime Enterprise Meeting Server 8.5.2 and 9.0 could allow an authenticated user to upload a malicious file to a Sametime meeting room, that could be downloaded by unsuspecting users which could be executed with user privileges. IBM X-Force ID: 111893. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8974 | 1 Ibm | 1 Rational Rhapsody Design Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Rhapsody DM 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) error when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume all available memory resources. IBM Reference #: 1997798. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9692 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Cast Iron Solution | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM WebSphere Cast Iron Solution 7.0.0 and 7.5.0.0 is vulnerable to External Service Interaction attack, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to induce the application to perform server-side DNS lookups or HTTP requests to arbitrary domain names. By submitting suitable payloads, an attacker can cause the application server to attack other systems that it can interact with. IBM X-Force ID: 119516. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0297 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager - Mobile Device Management (MDM) could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a missing HTTP Strict-Transport-Security Header through man in the middle techniques. | ||||