Total
8497 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-12130 | 2 Wcvendors, Wordpress | 2 Woocommerce Multi-vendor, Woocommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors, Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the /vendor_dashboard/product/delete/ endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete vendor products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12189 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Bread & Butter: Gate content + Capture leads + Collect first-party data + Nurture with Ai agents plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.10.1321. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the uploadImage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files that make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12190 | 2 Duddi, Wordpress | 2 Image Optimizer, Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Image Optimizer by wps.sk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the imagopby_ajax_optimize_gallery() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger bulk optimization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12373 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Torod – The smart shipping and delivery portal for e-shops and retailers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13144 | 2 Contentstudio, Wordpress | 2 Contentstudio, Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The ContentStudio plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.7. This is due to missing or insufficient nonce validation on the add_cstu_settings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13362 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Norby AI plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13684 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The ARK Related Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ark_rp_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12879 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 8.8 High |
| The User Generator and Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.2.2. This is due to missing nonce validation in the "Import Using CSV File" function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to elevate user privileges by creating arbitrary accounts with administrator privileges via a forged request, provided they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27195 | 2025-12-08 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sandi Verdev Watermark RELOADED allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Watermark RELOADED: from n/a through 1.3.5. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4889 | 1 Xibosignage | 1 Xibo | 2025-12-08 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in index.php in Digital Signage Xibo 1.4.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a new administrator via the AddUser action or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by CVE-2013-4888. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6670 | 1 Wso2 | 19 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Enterprise Integrator and 16 more | 2025-12-08 | 8.8 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in multiple WSO2 products due to the use of the HTTP GET method for state-changing operations within admin services, specifically in the event processor of the Carbon console. Although the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is used as a mitigation, it is ineffective in this context because it allows cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigations using GET requests. A malicious actor can exploit this vulnerability by tricking an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link, leading the browser to issue unintended state-changing requests. Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized operations such as data modification, account changes, or other administrative actions. According to WSO2 Secure Production Guidelines, exposure of Carbon console services to untrusted networks is discouraged, which may reduce the impact in properly secured deployments. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45538 | 1 Synology | 2 Diskstation Manager, Diskstation Manager Unified Controller | 2025-12-05 | 9.6 Critical |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebAPI Framework in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-2 and 7.2.2-72806 and Synology Unified Controller (DSMUC) before 3.1.4-23079 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53684 | 1 Socomec | 2 Diris M-70, Diris M-70 Firmware | 2025-12-05 | 7.5 High |
| A cross-site request forgery (csrf) vulnerability exists in the WEBVIEW-M functionality of Socomec DIRIS Digiware M-70 1.6.9. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to unauthorized access. An attacker can stage a malicious webpage to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1000137 | 1 Scilico | 1 I\, Librarian | 2025-12-05 | 8.8 High |
| I, Librarian version 4.8 and earlier contains a Cross site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in users.php that can result in the password of the admin being forced to be changed without the administrator's knowledge. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59114 | 1 Windu | 1 Windu Cms | 2025-12-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in file uploading functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send malicious file to the server. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59112 | 1 Windu | 1 Windu Cms | 2025-12-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in user editing functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send POST request that deletes given user. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59110 | 1 Windu | 1 Windu Cms | 2025-12-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| Windu CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in user editing functionality. Implemented CSRF protection mechanism can be bypassed by using CSRF token of other user. It is worth noting that the registration is open and anyone can create an account. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11154 | 2 Themeatelier, Wordpress | 2 Idonate, Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| The IDonate WordPress plugin before 2.1.13 does not have authorisation and CSRF when deleting users via an action handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13790 | 1 Scada-lts | 1 Scada-lts | 2025-12-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. This impacts an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65840 | 2 Publiccms, Sanluan | 2 Publiccms, Publiccms | 2025-12-04 | 8.8 High |
| PublicCMS V5.202506.b is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the CkEditorAdminController. | ||||