Filtered by CWE-918
Total 1694 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-3095 1 Langchain 1 Langchain 2024-11-21 7.7 High
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Web Research Retriever component of langchain-ai/langchain version 0.1.5. The vulnerability arises because the Web Research Retriever does not restrict requests to remote internet addresses, allowing it to reach local addresses. This flaw enables attackers to execute port scans, access local services, and in some scenarios, read instance metadata from cloud environments. The vulnerability is particularly concerning as it can be exploited to abuse the Web Explorer server as a proxy for web attacks on third parties and interact with servers in the local network, including reading their response data. This could potentially lead to arbitrary code execution, depending on the nature of the local services. The vulnerability is limited to GET requests, as POST requests are not possible, but the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is significant due to the potential for stolen credentials and state-changing interactions with internal APIs.
CVE-2024-39739 1 Ibm 2 Datacap, Datacap Navigator 2024-11-21 5.4 Medium
IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.5, 9.1.6, 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 296008.
CVE-2024-39699 1 Monospace 1 Directus 2024-11-21 5 Medium
Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. There was already a reported SSRF vulnerability via file import. It was fixed by resolving all DNS names and checking if the requested IP is an internal IP address. However it is possible to bypass this security measure and execute a SSRF using redirects. Directus allows redirects when importing file from the URL and does not check the result URL. Thus, it is possible to execute a request to an internal IP, for example to 127.0.0.1. However, it is blind SSRF, because Directus also uses response interception technique to get the information about the connect from the socket directly and it does not show a response if the IP address is internal. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.9.3.
CVE-2024-39687 1 Dahlia 1 Fedify 2024-11-21 7.2 High
Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub and other standards. At present, when Fedify needs to retrieve an object or activity from a remote activitypub server, it makes a HTTP request to the `@id` or other resources present within the activity it has received from the web. This activity could reference an `@id` that points to an internal IP address, allowing an attacker to send request to resources internal to the fedify server's network. This applies to not just resolution of documents containing activities or objects, but also to media URLs as well. Specifically this is a Server Side Request Forgery attack. Users should upgrade to Fedify version 0.9.2, 0.10.1, or 0.11.1 to receive a patch for this issue.
CVE-2024-39598 1 Sap 2 Customer Relationship Management S4fnd, Customer Relationship Management Webclient Ui 2024-11-21 5 Medium
SAP CRM (WebClient UI Framework) allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate accessible HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in information disclosure. It has no impact on integrity and availability of the application.
CVE-2024-38758 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2024-11-21 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WappPress Team WappPress.This issue affects WappPress: from n/a through 6.0.4.
CVE-2024-38730 1 Wpthemespace 1 Magical Addons For Elementor 2024-11-21 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Noor alam Magical Addons For Elementor.This issue affects Magical Addons For Elementor: from n/a through 1.1.41.
CVE-2024-38728 1 S-sols 1 Seraphinite Post .docx Source 2024-11-21 7.2 High
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source.This issue affects Seraphinite Post .DOCX Source: from n/a through 2.16.9.
CVE-2024-38723 1 Json-content-importer 1 Json Content Importer 2024-11-21 6.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Bernhard Kux JSON Content Importer.This issue affects JSON Content Importer: from n/a through 1.5.6.
CVE-2024-38514 2024-11-21 7.4 High
NextChat is a cross-platform ChatGPT/Gemini UI. There is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a lack of validation of the `endpoint` GET parameter on the WebDav API endpoint. This SSRF can be used to perform arbitrary HTTPS request from the vulnerable instance (MKCOL, PUT and GET methods supported), or to target NextChat users and make them execute arbitrary JavaScript code in their browser. This vulnerability has been patched in version 2.12.4.
CVE-2024-37942 1 Berqier 1 Berqwp 2024-11-21 7.2 High
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Berqier Ltd BerqWP.This issue affects BerqWP: from n/a through 1.7.5.
CVE-2024-37260 1 Themeruby 1 Foxiz 2024-11-21 7.2 High
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Theme-Ruby Foxiz.This issue affects Foxiz: from n/a through 2.3.5.
CVE-2024-37171 1 Sap 2 Saptmui, Transportation Management 2024-11-21 5 Medium
SAP Transportation Management (Collaboration Portal) allows an attacker with non-administrative privileges to send a crafted request from a vulnerable web application. This will trigger the application handler to send a request to an unintended service, which may reveal information about that service. The information obtained could be used to target internal systems behind firewalls that are normally inaccessible to an attacker from the external network, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. There is no effect on integrity or availability of the application.
CVE-2024-37157 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2024-11-21 6.4 Medium
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to version 3.2.3 on the `stable` branch and version 3.3.0.beta4 on the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches, a malicious actor could get the FastImage library to redirect requests to an internal Discourse IP. This issue is patched in version 3.2.3 on the `stable` branch and version 3.3.0.beta4 on the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches. No known workarounds are available.
CVE-2024-37098 2024-11-21 4.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes BlossomThemes Email Newsletter.This issue affects BlossomThemes Email Newsletter: from n/a through 2.2.6.
CVE-2024-36427 1 Targit 1 Decision Suite 2024-11-21 8.1 High
The file-serving function in TARGIT Decision Suite before 24.06.19002 (TARGIT Decision Suite 2024 – June) allows authenticated attackers to read or write to server files via a crafted file request. This can allow code execution via a .xview file.
CVE-2024-36414 1 Salesagility 1 Suitecrm 2024-11-21 7.7 High
SuiteCRM is an open-source Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 7.14.4 and 8.6.1, a vulnerability in the connectors file verification allows for a server-side request forgery attack. Versions 7.14.4 and 8.6.1 contain a fix for this issue.
CVE-2024-35637 2024-11-21 4.4 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Church Admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through 4.3.6.
CVE-2024-34689 1 Sap 2 Business Workflow, Sap Basis 2024-11-21 5 Medium
WebFlow Services of SAP Business Workflow allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate accessible HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in information disclosure. It has no impact on integrity and availability of the application.
CVE-2024-34581 2024-11-21 7.3 High
The W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification, starting with 1.0, was originally published with a "RetrievalMethod is a URI ... that may be used to obtain key and/or certificate information" statement and no accompanying information about SSRF risks, and this may have contributed to vulnerable implementations such as those discussed in CVE-2023-36661 and CVE-2024-21893. NOTE: this was mitigated in 1.1 and 2.0 via a directly referenced Best Practices document that calls on implementers to be wary of SSRF.