Total
8000 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-7078 | 1 07fly | 3 07fly-cms, 07flycms, Customer Relationship Management | 2025-08-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in 07FLYCMS, 07FLY-CMS and 07FlyCRM up to 1.3.9. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is published under multiple names. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41344 | 1 Codeigniter | 1 Codeigniter | 2025-08-01 | 7.5 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Codeigniter 3.1.13 allows attackers to arbitrarily change the Administrator password and escalate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1592 | 1 Really-simple-plugins | 1 Complianz | 2025-08-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Complianz – GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.5.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_delete function in class-DNSMPD.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete GDPR data requests via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1506 | 1 Wpmet | 1 Wp Social Login And Register Social Counter | 2025-08-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Wp Social Login and Register Social Counter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the counter_access_key_setup() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update social login provider settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54528 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Teamcity | 2025-07-31 | 5.4 Medium |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible in GitHub App connection flow | ||||
| CVE-2025-54529 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Teamcity | 2025-07-31 | 3.7 Low |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible in external OAuth login integration | ||||
| CVE-2025-54536 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Teamcity | 2025-07-31 | 5.4 Medium |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible on GraphQL endpoint | ||||
| CVE-2022-20853 | 1 Cisco | 2 Telepresence Video Communication Server, Telepresence Video Communication Server Software | 2025-07-31 | 7.4 High |
| A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the REST API to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected system to reload. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2015-4274 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Intelligence Center | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web framework in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center 10.0(1) and 10.6(1) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug IDs CSCuu94862 and CSCuu97936. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0740 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Intelligence Center | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center 10.6(1) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCus28826. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12253 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Intelligence Center | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCve76872. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1658 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Intelligence Center | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious, customized link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the affected device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4959 | 1 Redhat | 1 Quay | 2025-07-31 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Quay. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks force a user to perform unwanted actions in an application. During the pentest, it was detected that the config-editor page is vulnerable to CSRF. The config-editor page is used to configure the Quay instance. By coercing the victim’s browser into sending an attacker-controlled request from another domain, it is possible to reconfigure the Quay instance (including adding users with admin privileges). | ||||
| CVE-2025-36728 | 1 Simple-help | 1 Simplehelp | 2025-07-31 | 6.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Simplehelp.This issue affects Simplehelp: before 5.5.11. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1727 | 1 Gradio Project | 1 Gradio | 2025-07-30 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gradio-app/gradio allows attackers to upload multiple large files to a victim's system if they are running Gradio locally. By crafting a malicious HTML page that triggers an unauthorized file upload to the victim's server, an attacker can deplete the system's disk space, potentially leading to a denial of service. This issue affects the file upload functionality as implemented in gradio/routes.py. | ||||
| CVE-2019-15002 | 1 Atlassian | 3 Jira, Jira Data Center, Jira Server | 2025-07-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| An exploitable CSRF vulnerability exists in Atlassian Jira, from versions 7.6.4 to 8.1.0. The login form doesn’t require a CSRF token. As a result, an attacker can log a user into the system under an unexpected account. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26153 | 1 Etictelecom | 1 Remote Access Server Firmware | 2025-07-30 | 7.4 High |
| All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.9.19 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). An external attacker with no access to the device can force the end user into submitting a "setconf" method request, not requiring any CSRF token, which can lead into denial of service on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7756 | 1 Fabianros | 1 E-commerce Site | 2025-07-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in code-projects E-Commerce Site 1.0. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2014-100005 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dir-600, Dir-600 Firmware | 2025-07-30 | 8 High |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR-600 router (rev. Bx) with firmware before 2.17b02 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create an administrator account or (2) enable remote management via a crafted configuration module to hedwig.cgi, (3) activate new configuration settings via a SETCFG,SAVE,ACTIVATE action to pigwidgeon.cgi, or (4) send a ping via a ping action to diagnostic.php. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3718 | 6 Canonical, Imagemagick, Opensuse and 3 more | 31 Ubuntu Linux, Imagemagick, Leap and 28 more | 2025-07-30 | 5.5 Medium |
| The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. | ||||