Filtered by vendor Nodejs
Subscriptions
Total
182 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-15605 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Nodejs and 3 more | 16 Debian Linux, Fedora, Node.js and 13 more | 2025-04-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| HTTP request smuggling in Node.js 10, 12, and 13 causes malicious payload delivery when transfer-encoding is malformed | ||||
| CVE-2019-15604 | 5 Debian, Nodejs, Opensuse and 2 more | 12 Debian Linux, Node.js, Leap and 9 more | 2025-04-30 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Certificate Validation in Node.js 10, 12, and 13 causes the process to abort when sending a crafted X.509 certificate | ||||
| CVE-2023-23920 | 3 Debian, Nodejs, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-30 | 4.2 Medium |
| An untrusted search path vulnerability exists in Node.js. <19.6.1, <18.14.1, <16.19.1, and <14.21.3 that could allow an attacker to search and potentially load ICU data when running with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23919 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Node.js, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-30 | 7.5 High |
| A cryptographic vulnerability exists in Node.js <19.2.0, <18.14.1, <16.19.1, <14.21.3 that in some cases did does not clear the OpenSSL error stack after operations that may set it. This may lead to false positive errors during subsequent cryptographic operations that happen to be on the same thread. This in turn could be used to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23918 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 4 Node.js, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2025-04-30 | 7.5 High |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Node.js <19.6.1, <18.14.1, <16.19.1 and <14.21.3 that made it possible to bypass the experimental Permissions (https://nodejs.org/api/permissions.html) feature in Node.js and access non authorized modules by using process.mainModule.require(). This only affects users who had enabled the experimental permissions option with --experimental-policy. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43548 | 3 Debian, Nodejs, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-30 | 8.1 High |
| A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions <14.21.1, <16.18.1, <18.12.1, <19.0.1 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that can easily be bypassed because IsIPAddress does not properly check if an IP address is invalid before making DBS requests allowing rebinding attacks.The fix for this issue in https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-32212 was incomplete and this new CVE is to complete the fix. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35255 | 4 Debian, Nodejs, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Node.js, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-30 | 9.1 Critical |
| A weak randomness in WebCrypto keygen vulnerability exists in Node.js 18 due to a change with EntropySource() in SecretKeyGenTraits::DoKeyGen() in src/crypto/crypto_keygen.cc. There are two problems with this: 1) It does not check the return value, it assumes EntropySource() always succeeds, but it can (and sometimes will) fail. 2) The random data returned byEntropySource() may not be cryptographically strong and therefore not suitable as keying material. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36046 | 2 Nodejs, Vercel | 2 Node.js, Next.js | 2025-04-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| Next.js is a React framework that can provide building blocks to create web applications. All of the following must be true to be affected by this CVE: Next.js version 12.2.3, Node.js version above v15.0.0 being used with strict `unhandledRejection` exiting AND using next start or a [custom server](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/custom-server). Deployments on Vercel ([vercel.com](https://vercel.com/)) are not affected along with similar environments where `next-server` isn't being shared across requests. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31150 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Undici, Acm | 2025-04-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js. It is possible to inject CRLF sequences into request headers in undici in versions less than 5.7.1. A fix was released in version 5.8.0. Sanitizing all HTTP headers from untrusted sources to eliminate `\r\n` is a workaround for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31151 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Undici, Acm | 2025-04-22 | 3.7 Low |
| Authorization headers are cleared on cross-origin redirect. However, cookie headers which are sensitive headers and are official headers found in the spec, remain uncleared. There are active users using cookie headers in undici. This may lead to accidental leakage of cookie to a 3rd-party site or a malicious attacker who can control the redirection target (ie. an open redirector) to leak the cookie to the 3rd party site. This was patched in v5.7.1. By default, this vulnerability is not exploitable. Do not enable redirections, i.e. `maxRedirections: 0` (the default). | ||||
| CVE-2022-35949 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Undici, Acm | 2025-04-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `undici@5.8.1`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35948 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Undici, Acm | 2025-04-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=< undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from 'undici' const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = 'application/json\r\n\r\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1' await request('http://localhost:3000, { method: 'GET', headers: { 'content-type': unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3744 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a %2e%2e (encoded dot dot) in an unspecified path. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7454 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via nested forbidden strings. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7453 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via vectors related to UI redressing. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7452 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via a crafted javascript URI. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7451 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the XSS filter via a nested tag. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000381 | 4 C-ares, C-ares Project, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 C-ares, C-ares, Node.js and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| The c-ares function `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`, which is used for parsing NAPTR responses, could be triggered to read memory outside of the given input buffer if the passed in DNS response packet was crafted in a particular way. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11499 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Node.js, Rhel Software Collections | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Node.js v4.0 through v4.8.3, all versions of v5.x, v6.0 through v6.11.0, v7.0 through v7.10.0, and v8.0 through v8.1.3 was susceptible to hash flooding remote DoS attacks as the HashTable seed was constant across a given released version of Node.js. This was a result of building with V8 snapshots enabled by default which caused the initially randomized seed to be overwritten on startup. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9842 | 8 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 5 more | 22 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 19 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| The inflateMark function in inflate.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving left shifts of negative integers. | ||||