Total
260 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-22871 | 2025-04-18 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| The net/http package improperly accepts a bare LF as a line terminator in chunked data chunk-size lines. This can permit request smuggling if a net/http server is used in conjunction with a server that incorrectly accepts a bare LF as part of a chunk-ext. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0752 | 1 Redhat | 1 Service Mesh | 2025-04-17 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 and 2.5.6. Rate-limiter avoidance, access-control bypass, CPU and memory exhaustion, and replay attacks may be possible due to improper HTTP header sanitization in Envoy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22081 | 2 Elspec, Elspec-ltd | 3 G5 Digital Fault Recorder, G5dfr, G5dfr Firmware | 2025-04-16 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Elspec G5 digital fault recorder versions 1.1.4.15 and before. Unauthenticated memory corruption can occur in the HTTP header parsing mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0099 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 11 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Bpms and 8 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/Ascii.java in Apache Tomcat before 6.0.40, 7.x before 7.0.53, and 8.x before 8.0.4, when operated behind a reverse proxy, allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a crafted Content-Length HTTP header. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2086 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.42, 0.12.x before 0.12.10, 4.x before 4.3.0, and 5.x before 5.6.0 allow remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a crafted Content-Length HTTP header. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1386 | 2025-04-11 | N/A | ||
| When using the ch-go library, under a specific condition when the query includes a large, uncompressed malicious external data, it is possible for an attacker in control of such data to smuggle another query packet into the connection stream. | ||||
| CVE-2006-6276 | 1 Sun | 4 Java System Application Server, Java System Web Proxy Server, Java System Web Server and 1 more | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in Sun Java System Proxy Server before 20061130, when used with Sun Java System Application Server or Sun Java System Web Server, allows remote attackers to bypass HTTP request filtering, hijack web sessions, perform cross-site scripting (XSS), and poison web caches via unspecified attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36760 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services | 2025-04-04 | 9 Critical |
| Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') vulnerability in mod_proxy_ajp of Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker to smuggle requests to the AJP server it forwards requests to. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server 2.4 version 2.4.54 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41721 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 5 H2c, Acm, Migration Toolkit Applications and 2 more | 2025-04-04 | 7.5 High |
| A request smuggling attack is possible when using MaxBytesHandler. When using MaxBytesHandler, the body of an HTTP request is not fully consumed. When the server attempts to read HTTP2 frames from the connection, it will instead be reading the body of the HTTP request, which could be attacker-manipulated to represent arbitrary HTTP2 requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30346 | 2 Varnish-software, Varnish Cache Project | 2 Varnish Enterprise, Varnish Cache | 2025-04-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Varnish Cache before 7.6.2 and Varnish Enterprise before 6.0.13r10 allow client-side desync via HTTP/1 requests. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2088 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 3 Http Server, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The Apache HTTP server before 1.3.34, and 2.0.x before 2.0.55, when acting as an HTTP proxy, allows remote attackers to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks via an HTTP request with both a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header and a Content-Length header, which causes Apache to incorrectly handle and forward the body of the request in a way that causes the receiving server to process it as a separate HTTP request, aka "HTTP Request Smuggling." | ||||
| CVE-2005-2089 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Internet Information Services | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Microsoft IIS 5.0 and 6.0 allows remote attackers to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks via an HTTP request with both a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header and a Content-Length header, which causes IIS to incorrectly handle and forward the body of the request in a way that causes the receiving server to process it as a separate HTTP request, aka "HTTP Request Smuggling." | ||||
| CVE-2025-31137 | 2025-04-02 | N/A | ||
| React Router is a multi-strategy router for React bridging the gap from React 18 to React 19. There is a vulnerability in Remix/React Router that affects all Remix 2 and React Router 7 consumers using the Express adapter. Basically, this vulnerability allows anyone to spoof the URL used in an incoming Request by putting a URL pathname in the port section of a URL that is part of a Host or X-Forwarded-Host header sent to a Remix/React Router request handler. This issue has been patched and released in Remix 2.16.3 and React Router 7.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23691 | 1 Dell | 6 Powervault Me5012, Powervault Me5012 Firmware, Powervault Me5024 and 3 more | 2025-04-02 | 8.1 High |
| Dell EMC PV ME5, versions ME5.1.0.0.0 and ME5.1.0.1.0, contains a Client-side desync Vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to force a victim's browser to desynchronize its connection with the website, typically leading to XSS and DoS. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27185 | 1 Joomial Project | 1 Joomial Cms | 2025-03-29 | 9.1 Critical |
| The pagination class includes arbitrary parameters in links, leading to cache poisoning attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39163 | 1 Ibm | 1 Controller | 2025-03-27 | 4.7 Medium |
| IBM Cognos Controller 11.0.0 through 11.1.0 is vulnerable to a Client-Side Desync (CSD) attack where an attacker could exploit a desynchronized browser connection that could lead to further cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50811 | 1 Seling | 1 Visual Access Manager | 2025-03-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue discovered in SELESTA Visual Access Manager 4.38.6 allows attackers to modify the “computer” POST parameter related to the ID of a specific reception by POST HTTP request interception. Iterating that parameter, it has been possible to access to the application and take control of many other receptions in addition the assigned one. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25725 | 3 Debian, Haproxy, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Haproxy, Ceph Storage and 3 more | 2025-03-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| HAProxy before 2.7.3 may allow a bypass of access control because HTTP/1 headers are inadvertently lost in some situations, aka "request smuggling." The HTTP header parsers in HAProxy may accept empty header field names, which could be used to truncate the list of HTTP headers and thus make some headers disappear after being parsed and processed for HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1. For HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, the impact is limited because the headers disappear before being parsed and processed, as if they had not been sent by the client. The fixed versions are 2.7.3, 2.6.9, 2.5.12, 2.4.22, 2.2.29, and 2.0.31. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6827 | 1 Redhat | 1 Discovery | 2025-03-20 | N/A |
| Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data exposure, session manipulation, SSRF, XSS, DoS, data integrity compromise, security bypass, information leakage, and business logic abuse. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10264 | 2025-03-20 | N/A | ||
| HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability in netease-youdao/qanything version 1.4.1 allows attackers to exploit inconsistencies in the interpretation of HTTP requests between a proxy and a server. This can lead to unauthorized access, bypassing security controls, session hijacking, data leakage, and potentially arbitrary code execution. | ||||