Total
96 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-30221 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | ||
| Pitchfork is a preforking HTTP server for Rack applications. Versions prior to 0.11.0 are vulnerable to HTTP Response Header Injection when used in conjunction with Rack 3. The issue was fixed in Pitchfork release 0.11.0. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32708 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-02-28 | 7.2 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.0.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.14, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.0.2303.100, a low-privileged user can trigger an HTTP response splitting vulnerability with the ‘rest’ SPL command that lets them potentially access other REST endpoints in the system arbitrarily. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25690 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 5 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Some mod_proxy configurations on Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 through 2.4.55 allow a HTTP Request Smuggling attack. Configurations are affected when mod_proxy is enabled along with some form of RewriteRule or ProxyPassMatch in which a non-specific pattern matches some portion of the user-supplied request-target (URL) data and is then re-inserted into the proxied request-target using variable substitution. For example, something like: RewriteEngine on RewriteRule "^/here/(.*)" "http://example.com:8080/elsewhere?$1"; [P] ProxyPassReverse /here/ http://example.com:8080/ Request splitting/smuggling could result in bypass of access controls in the proxy server, proxying unintended URLs to existing origin servers, and cache poisoning. Users are recommended to update to at least version 2.4.56 of Apache HTTP Server. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41834 | 1 Apache | 1 Flink Stateful Functions | 2025-02-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers in Apache Flink Stateful Functions 3.1.0, 3.1.1 and 3.2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via crafted HTTP requests. Attackers could potentially inject malicious content into the HTTP response that is sent to the user's browser. Users should upgrade to Apache Flink Stateful Functions version 3.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29406 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 19 Go, Advanced Cluster Security, Cryostat and 16 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| The HTTP/1 client does not fully validate the contents of the Host header. A maliciously crafted Host header can inject additional headers or entire requests. With fix, the HTTP/1 client now refuses to send requests containing an invalid Request.Host or Request.URL.Host value. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45687 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') vulnerability in Payara Platform Payara Server (Grizzly, REST Management Interface modules), Payara Platform Payara Micro (Grizzly modules) allows Manipulating State, Identity Spoofing.This issue affects Payara Server: from 4.1.151 through 4.1.2.191.51, from 5.20.0 through 5.70.0, from 5.2020.2 through 5.2022.5, from 6.2022.1 through 6.2024.12, from 6.0.0 through 6.21.0; Payara Micro: from 4.1.152 through 4.1.2.191.51, from 5.20.0 through 5.70.0, from 5.2020.2 through 5.2022.5, from 6.2022.1 through 6.2024.12, from 6.0.0 through 6.21.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0508 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-01-07 | 3.1 Low |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.10.8, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.7, all versions starting from 16.0 before 16.0.2. Open redirection was possible via HTTP response splitting in the NPM package API. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12308 | 1 Cisco | 170 Esw2-350g-52, Esw2-350g-52 Firmware, Esw2-350g-52dc and 167 more | 2024-12-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Small Business Managed Switches software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack against a user of the web interface of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of some parameters that are passed to the web server of the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing a user to follow a malicious link or by intercepting a user request and injecting malicious code into the request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected web interface or allow the attacker to access sensitive browser-based information. This vulnerability affects the following Cisco Small Business 300 and 500 Series Managed Switches: Cisco 350 Series Managed Switches, Cisco 350X Series Stackable Managed Switches, Cisco 550X Series Stackable Managed Switches, Cisco ESW2 Series Advanced Switches, Cisco Small Business 300 Series Managed Switches, Cisco Small Business 500 Series Stackable Managed Switches. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg29980. | ||||
| CVE-2019-12387 | 5 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Oracle and 2 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Solaris and 5 more | 2024-11-25 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Twisted before 19.2.1, twisted.web did not validate or sanitize URIs or HTTP methods, allowing an attacker to inject invalid characters such as CRLF. | ||||
| CVE-2019-15259 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Contact Center Express | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCX) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of some parameters that are passed to the web server of the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing a user to follow a malicious link or by intercepting a user request on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform cross-site scripting attacks, web cache poisoning, access sensitive browser-based information, and similar exploits. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40324 | 1 Datex-soft | 1 E-staff | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability in E-Staff v5.1 allows attackers to insert Carriage Return (CR) and Line Feed (LF) characters into input fields, leading to HTTP response splitting and header manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34472 | 1 Ami | 1 Megarac Sp-x | 2024-11-21 | 5.7 Medium |
| AMI SPx contains a vulnerability in the BMC where an Attacker may cause an improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP Headers. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to a loss of integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26147 | 1 Ithewei | 1 Libhv | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| All versions of the package ithewei/libhv are vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting when untrusted user input is used to build headers values. An attacker can add the \r\n (carriage return line feeds) characters to end the HTTP response headers and inject malicious content, like for example additional headers or new response body, leading to a potential XSS vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26142 | 1 Crowcpp | 1 Crow | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| All versions of the package crow are vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting when untrusted user input is used to build header values. Header values are not properly sanitized against CRLF Injection in the set_header and add_header functions. An attacker can add the \r\n (carriage return line feeds) characters to end the HTTP response headers and inject malicious content. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26137 | 1 Drogon | 1 Drogon | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 High |
| All versions of the package drogonframework/drogon are vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting when untrusted user input is used to build header values in the addHeader and addCookie functions. An attacker can add the \r\n (carriage return line feeds) characters to end the HTTP response headers and inject malicious content. | ||||
| CVE-2022-42472 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2024-11-21 | 4 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of crlf sequences in http headers ('http response splitting') in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.8, 6.4.0 through 6.4.11, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, 6.0.0 through 6.0.16, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 2.0.0 through 2.0.10, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6 may allow an authenticated and remote attacker to perform an HTTP request splitting attack which gives attackers control of the remaining headers and body of the response. | ||||
| CVE-2022-42471 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] In FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, FortiWeb version 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, FortiWeb version 6.3.6 through 6.3.20 may allow an authenticated and remote attacker to inject arbitrary headers. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37953 | 1 Ge | 1 Workstationst | 2024-11-21 | 4.7 Medium |
| An HTTP response splitting vulnerability exists in the AM Gateway Challenge-Response dialog of WorkstationST (<v07.09.15) and could allow an attacker to compromise a victim's browser/session. WorkstationST is only deployed in specific, controlled environments rendering attack complexity significantly higher than if the attack were conducted on the software in isolation. WorkstationST v07.09.15 can be found in ControlST v07.09.07 SP8 and greater. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20772 | 1 Cisco | 4 Email Security Appliance, Email Security Appliance Firmware, Secure Email And Web Manager and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an HTTP response splitting attack. This vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input values. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious HTTP headers, controlling the response body, or splitting the response into multiple responses. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40336 | 1 Hitachienergy | 2 Modular Switchgear Monitoring, Modular Switchgear Monitoring Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 5 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in the http web interface where the web interface does not validate data in an HTTP header. This causes a possible HTTP response splitting, which if exploited could lead an attacker to channel down harmful code into the user’s web browser, such as to steal the session cookies. Thus, an attacker who successfully makes an MSM user who has already established a session to MSM web interface clicks a forged link to the MSM web interface, e.g., the link is sent per E-Mail, could trick the user into downloading malicious software onto his computer. This issue affects: Hitachi Energy MSM V2.2 and prior versions. | ||||