Total
1700 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-49785 | 1 Nextchat | 1 Nextchat | 2025-04-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| NextChat, also known as ChatGPT-Next-Web, is a cross-platform chat user interface for use with ChatGPT. Versions 2.11.2 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery and cross-site scripting. This vulnerability enables read access to internal HTTP endpoints but also write access using HTTP POST, PUT, and other methods. Attackers can also use this vulnerability to mask their source IP by forwarding malicious traffic intended for other Internet targets through these open proxies. As of time of publication, no patch is available, but other mitigation strategies are available. Users may avoid exposing the application to the public internet or, if exposing the application to the internet, ensure it is an isolated network with no access to any other internal resources. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1965 | 1 Haivision | 4 Aviwest Manager, Aviwest Streamhub, Maanager and 1 more | 2025-04-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Haivision's Aviwest Manager and Aviwest Steamhub. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to enumerate internal network configuration without the need for credentials. An attacker could compromise an internal server and retrieve requests sent by other users. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6784 | 1 Abb | 41 Aspect-ent-12, Aspect-ent-12 Firmware, Aspect-ent-2 and 38 more | 2025-04-10 | 9.9 Critical |
| Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerabilities were found providing a potential for access to unauthorized resources and unintended information disclosure. Affected products: ABB ASPECT - Enterprise v3.08.02; NEXUS Series v3.08.02; MATRIX Series v3.08.02 | ||||
| CVE-2025-25785 | 1 Jizhicms | 1 Jizhicms | 2025-04-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| JizhiCMS v2.5.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component \c\PluginsController.php. This vulnerability allows attackers to perform an intranet scan via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57767 | 1 Wangl1989 | 1 Mysiteforme | 2025-04-10 | 8.6 High |
| MSFM before v2025.01.01 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /file/download. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39039 | 1 Aenrich | 1 A\+hrd | 2025-04-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| aEnrich’s a+HRD has inadequate filtering for specific URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary HTTP(s) request to launch Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack, to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29102 | 1 Esri | 1 Arcgis Server | 2025-04-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ArcGIS Server Manager version 10.8.1 and below may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge GET requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2022-38187 | 1 Esri | 1 Portal For Arcgis | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| Prior to version 10.9.0, the sharing/rest/content/features/analyze endpoint is always accessible to anonymous users, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to induce Esri Portal for ArcGIS to read arbitrary URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2022-38203 | 1 Esri | 1 Portal For Arcgis | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212. | ||||
| CVE-2022-38211 | 1 Esri | 1 Portal For Arcgis | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.9.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38212. | ||||
| CVE-2022-38212 | 1 Esri | 1 Portal For Arcgis | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| Protections against potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below were not fully honored and may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to forge requests to arbitrary URLs from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or reading from hosts inside the network perimeter, a different issue than CVE-2022-38211 and CVE-2022-38203. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32675 | 2025-04-09 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in QuantumCloud SEO Help allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects SEO Help: from n/a through 6.6.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32487 | 2025-04-09 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Joe Waymark allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Waymark: from n/a through 1.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31009 | 2025-04-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jan Boddez IndieBlocks allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects IndieBlocks: from n/a through 0.13.1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3841 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2025-04-09 | 7.8 High |
| RHACM: unauthenticated SSRF in console API endpoint. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in the console API endpoint from Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes (RHACM). An attacker could take advantage of this as the console API endpoint is missing an authentication check, allowing unauthenticated users making requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25760 | 1 Sucms Project | 1 Sucms | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 High |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the component admin_webgather.php of SUCMS v1.0 allows attackers to access internal data and services via a crafted GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-44677 | 1 Eladmin | 1 Eladmin | 2025-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| eladmin v2.7 and before is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the DatabaseController.java component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20332 | 1 Cisco | 1 Identity Services Engine | 2025-04-08 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid Super Admin credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32013 | 1 Lnbits | 1 Lnbits | 2025-04-08 | 7.5 High |
| LNbits is a Lightning wallet and accounts system. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been discovered in LNbits' LNURL authentication handling functionality. When processing LNURL authentication requests, the application accepts a callback URL parameter and makes an HTTP request to that URL using the httpx library with redirect following enabled. The application doesn't properly validate the callback URL, allowing attackers to specify internal network addresses and access internal resources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3411 | 2025-04-08 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in mymagicpower AIAS 20250308. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file 3_api_platform/api-platform/src/main/java/top/aias/platform/controller/AsrController.java. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||