Filtered by vendor Kayako
Subscriptions
Total
26 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2005-0842 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 2.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) _i or (2) _c parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2460 | 1 Kayako | 1 Liveresponse | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Kayako liveResponse 2.x allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) username parameter or (2) name field when entering a session or sending a message. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4637 | 1 Kayako | 1 Supportsuite | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in index.php in Kayako SupportSuite 3.00.26 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) nav parameter in the downloads module, (2) Full Name and (3) Email fields in the core module, (4) Full Name, (5) Email, and (6) Subject fields in the tickets module, or (7) Registered Email field in the lostpassword feature in the core module. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4638 | 1 Kayako | 1 Supportsuite | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| index.php in Kayako SupportSuite 3.00.26 and earlier allow remote attackers to obtain the full path via (1) _a and (2) newsid parameters in the news module, (3) downloaditemid parameter in the downloads module, and (4) kbarticleid parameter in the knowledgebase module. | ||||
| CVE-2004-1412 | 1 Kayako | 1 Esupport | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Kayako eSupport 2.x allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the searchm parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35913 | 1 Kayako | 1 Samourai | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Samourai Wallet Stonewallx2 0.99.98e allows a denial of service via a P2P coinjoin. The attacker and victim must follow each other's paynym. Then, the victim must try to collaborate with the attacker for a Stonewallx2 transaction. Next, the attacker broadcasts a tx, spending the inputs used in Stonewallx2 before the victim can broadcast the collaborative transaction. The attacker does not signal opt in RBF, and uses the lowest fee rate. This would result in the victim being unable to perform Stonewallx2. (Note that the attacker could use multiple paynyms.) | ||||