Filtered by vendor Sendmail
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Sendmail
Subscriptions
Total
33 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2002-1827 | 1 Sendmail | 1 Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Sendmail 8.9.0 through 8.12.3 allows local users to cause a denial of service by obtaining an exclusive lock on the (1) alias, (2) map, (3) statistics, and (4) pid files. | ||||
| CVE-2001-1349 | 2 Redhat, Sendmail | 2 Linux, Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Sendmail before 8.11.4, and 8.12.0 before 8.12.0.Beta10, allows local users to cause a denial of service and possibly corrupt the heap and gain privileges via race conditions in signal handlers. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1337 | 8 Gentoo, Hp, Netbsd and 5 more | 11 Linux, Alphaserver Sc, Hp-ux and 8 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in Sendmail 5.79 to 8.12.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain formatted address fields, related to sender and recipient header comments as processed by the crackaddr function of headers.c. | ||||
| CVE-1999-1309 | 1 Sendmail | 1 Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Sendmail before 8.6.7 allows local users to gain root access via a large value in the debug (-d) command line option. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0308 | 2 Debian, Sendmail | 2 Debian Linux, Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The Sendmail 8.12.3 package in Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 does not securely create temporary files, which could allow local users to gain additional privileges via (1) expn, (2) checksendmail, or (3) doublebounce.pl. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0478 | 1 Sendmail | 1 Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Denial of service in HP-UX sendmail 8.8.6 related to accepting connections. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0653 | 2 Redhat, Sendmail | 2 Linux, Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Sendmail 8.10.0 through 8.11.5, and 8.12.0 beta, allows local users to modify process memory and possibly gain privileges via a large value in the 'category' part of debugger (-d) command line arguments, which is interpreted as a negative number. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0715 | 1 Sendmail | 1 Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Sendmail before 8.12.1, without the RestrictQueueRun option enabled, allows local users to obtain potentially sensitive information about the mail queue by setting debugging flags to enable debug mode. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0688 | 6 Compaq, Freebsd, Openbsd and 3 more | 7 Tru64, Freebsd, Openbsd and 4 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The DNS map code in Sendmail 8.12.8 and earlier, when using the "enhdnsbl" feature, does not properly initialize certain data structures, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via an invalid DNS response that causes Sendmail to free incorrect data. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1165 | 3 Netbsd, Redhat, Sendmail | 4 Netbsd, Enterprise Linux, Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Sendmail Consortium's Restricted Shell (SMRSH) in Sendmail 8.12.6, 8.11.6-15, and possibly other versions after 8.11 from 5/19/1998, allows attackers to bypass the intended restrictions of smrsh by inserting additional commands after (1) "||" sequences or (2) "/" characters, which are not properly filtered or verified. | ||||
| CVE-2002-2423 | 1 Sendmail | 1 Sendmail | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Sendmail 8.12.0 through 8.12.6 truncates log messages longer than 100 characters, which allows remote attackers to prevent the IP address from being logged via a long IDENT response. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51765 | 3 Freebsd, Redhat, Sendmail | 3 Freebsd, Enterprise Linux, Sendmail | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| sendmail through 8.17.2 allows SMTP smuggling in certain configurations. Remote attackers can use a published exploitation technique to inject e-mail messages with a spoofed MAIL FROM address, allowing bypass of an SPF protection mechanism. This occurs because sendmail supports <LF>.<CR><LF> but some other popular e-mail servers do not. This is resolved in 8.18 and later versions with 'o' in srv_features. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3618 | 5 Debian, F5, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Debian Linux, Nginx, Fedora and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.4 High |
| ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the TCP/IP layer can redirect traffic from one subdomain to another, resulting in a valid TLS session. This breaks the authentication of TLS and cross-protocol attacks may be possible where the behavior of one protocol service may compromise the other at the application layer. | ||||