Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Rhosemc
Subscriptions
Total
109 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-4629 | 1 Redhat | 12 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Enterprise Linux and 9 more | 2025-09-23 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. This flaw allows attackers to bypass brute force protection by exploiting the timing of login attempts. By initiating multiple login requests simultaneously, attackers can exceed the configured limits for failed attempts before the system locks them out. This timing loophole enables attackers to make more guesses at passwords than intended, potentially compromising account security on affected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4540 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2025-09-12 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak in OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests (PAR). Client-provided parameters were found to be included in plain text in the KC_RESTART cookie returned by the authorization server's HTTP response to a `request_uri` authorization request, possibly leading to an information disclosure vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5967 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2025-09-12 | 2.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. The LDAP testing endpoint allows changing the Connection URL independently without re-entering the currently configured LDAP bind credentials. This flaw allows an attacker with admin access (permission manage-realm) to change the LDAP host URL ("Connection URL") to a machine they control. The Keycloak server will connect to the attacker's host and try to authenticate with the configured credentials, thus leaking them to the attacker. As a consequence, an attacker who has compromised the admin console or compromised a user with sufficient privileges can leak domain credentials and attack the domain. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6484 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2025-09-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| A log injection flaw was found in Keycloak. A text string may be injected through the authentication form when using the WebAuthn authentication mode. This issue may have a minor impact to the logs integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8883 | 1 Redhat | 10 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 7 more | 2025-09-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| A misconfiguration flaw was found in Keycloak. This issue can allow an attacker to redirect users to an arbitrary URL if a 'Valid Redirect URI' is set to http://localhost or http://127.0.0.1, enabling sensitive information such as authorization codes to be exposed to the attacker, potentially leading to session hijacking. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8698 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2025-09-12 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1249 | 1 Redhat | 15 Amq Broker, Amq Streams, Build Keycloak and 12 more | 2025-08-07 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's OIDC component in the "checkLoginIframe," which allows unvalidated cross-origin messages. This flaw allows attackers to coordinate and send millions of requests in seconds using simple code, significantly impacting the application's availability without proper origin validation for incoming messages. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1132 | 1 Redhat | 23 Amq Broker, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 20 more | 2025-08-07 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6544 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Rhosemc | 2025-08-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak package. This issue occurs due to a permissive regular expression hardcoded for filtering which allows hosts to register a dynamic client. A malicious user with enough information about the environment could jeopardize an environment with this specific Dynamic Client Registration and TrustedDomain configuration previously unauthorized. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4057 | 1 Redhat | 2 Amq Broker, Rhosemc | 2025-07-31 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in ActiveMQ Artemis. The password generated by activemq-artemis-operator does not regenerate between separated CR dependencies. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23302 | 6 Apache, Broadcom, Netapp and 3 more | 44 Log4j, Brocade Sannav, Snapmanager and 41 more | 2025-07-07 | 8.8 High |
| JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in August 2015. Users should upgrade to Log4j 2 as it addresses numerous other issues from the previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1471 | 2 Redhat, Snakeyaml Project | 14 Amq Clients, Amq Streams, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2025-06-18 | 8.3 High |
| SnakeYaml's Constructor() class does not restrict types which can be instantiated during deserialization. Deserializing yaml content provided by an attacker can lead to remote code execution. We recommend using SnakeYaml's SafeConsturctor when parsing untrusted content to restrict deserialization. We recommend upgrading to version 2.0 and beyond. | ||||
| CVE-2022-37603 | 2 Redhat, Webpack.js | 8 Jboss Data Grid, Logging, Migration Toolkit Applications and 5 more | 2025-05-15 | 7.5 High |
| A Regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) flaw was found in Function interpolateName in interpolateName.js in webpack loader-utils 2.0.0 via the url variable in interpolateName.js. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41723 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 22 Go, Hpack, Http2 and 19 more | 2025-05-05 | 7.5 High |
| A maliciously crafted HTTP/2 stream could cause excessive CPU consumption in the HPACK decoder, sufficient to cause a denial of service from a small number of small requests. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21698 | 4 Fedoraproject, Prometheus, Rdo Project and 1 more | 17 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Client Golang and 14 more | 2025-04-23 | 7.5 High |
| client_golang is the instrumentation library for Go applications in Prometheus, and the promhttp package in client_golang provides tooling around HTTP servers and clients. In client_golang prior to version 1.11.1, HTTP server is susceptible to a Denial of Service through unbounded cardinality, and potential memory exhaustion, when handling requests with non-standard HTTP methods. In order to be affected, an instrumented software must use any of `promhttp.InstrumentHandler*` middleware except `RequestsInFlight`; not filter any specific methods (e.g GET) before middleware; pass metric with `method` label name to our middleware; and not have any firewall/LB/proxy that filters away requests with unknown `method`. client_golang version 1.11.1 contains a patch for this issue. Several workarounds are available, including removing the `method` label name from counter/gauge used in the InstrumentHandler; turning off affected promhttp handlers; adding custom middleware before promhttp handler that will sanitize the request method given by Go http.Request; and using a reverse proxy or web application firewall, configured to only allow a limited set of methods. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41881 | 3 Debian, Netty, Redhat | 14 Debian Linux, Netty, Camel Quarkus and 11 more | 2025-04-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| Netty project is an event-driven asynchronous network application framework. In versions prior to 4.1.86.Final, a StackOverflowError can be raised when parsing a malformed crafted message due to an infinite recursion. This issue is patched in version 4.1.86.Final. There is no workaround, except using a custom HaProxyMessageDecoder. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45693 | 3 Debian, Jettison Project, Redhat | 10 Debian Linux, Jettison, Camel Spring Boot and 7 more | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| Jettison before v1.5.2 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the map parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted string. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46364 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 10 Cxf, Camel Spring Boot, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 7 more | 2025-04-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| A SSRF vulnerability in parsing the href attribute of XOP:Include in MTOM requests in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on webservices that take at least one parameter of any type. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46363 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Cxf, Camel K, Camel Spring Boot and 6 more | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in Apache CXF before versions 3.5.5 and 3.4.10 allows an attacker to perform a remote directory listing or code exfiltration. The vulnerability only applies when the CXFServlet is configured with both the static-resources-list and redirect-query-check attributes. These attributes are not supposed to be used together, and so the vulnerability can only arise if the CXF service is misconfigured. | ||||
| CVE-2022-38751 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Snakeyaml Project | 9 Debian Linux, Amq Broker, Camel Spring Boot and 6 more | 2025-04-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Using snakeYAML to parse untrusted YAML files may be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks (DOS). If the parser is running on user supplied input, an attacker may supply content that causes the parser to crash by stackoverflow. | ||||