Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift
Subscriptions
Total
1060 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-0296 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2025-04-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw (CVE-2016-2183) was reported for the health checks port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy, hence this port might be considered as still vulnerable to the same type of vulnerability. The health checks on etcd grpc-proxy do not contain sensitive data (only metrics data), therefore the potential impact related to this vulnerability is minimal. The CVE-2023-0296 has been assigned to this issue to track the permanent fix in the etcd component. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41721 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 5 H2c, Acm, Migration Toolkit Applications and 2 more | 2025-04-04 | 7.5 High |
| A request smuggling attack is possible when using MaxBytesHandler. When using MaxBytesHandler, the body of an HTTP request is not fully consumed. When the server attempts to read HTTP2 frames from the connection, it will instead be reading the body of the HTTP request, which could be attacker-manipulated to represent arbitrary HTTP2 requests. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44228 | 13 Apache, Apple, Bentley and 10 more | 178 Log4j, Xcode, Synchro and 175 more | 2025-04-03 | 10 Critical |
| Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22863 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12.0 through 21.0.2 defaults to HTTP in some RPA commands when the prefix is not explicitly specified in the URL. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 244109. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22594 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 20.12.0 through 21.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 244075. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3560 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Polkit Project and 1 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Polkit and 7 more | 2025-04-03 | 7.8 High |
| It was found that polkit could be tricked into bypassing the credential checks for D-Bus requests, elevating the privileges of the requestor to the root user. This flaw could be used by an unprivileged local attacker to, for example, create a new local administrator. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22592 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2025-04-03 | 4 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1 through 21.0.4 could allow a local user to perform unauthorized actions due to insufficient permission settings. IBM X-Force ID: 244073. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9676 | 1 Redhat | 20 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 and 17 more | 2025-04-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Podman, Buildah, and CRI-O. A symlink traversal vulnerability in the containers/storage library can cause Podman, Buildah, and CRI-O to hang and result in a denial of service via OOM kill when running a malicious image using an automatically assigned user namespace (`--userns=auto` in Podman and Buildah). The containers/storage library will read /etc/passwd inside the container, but does not properly validate if that file is a symlink, which can be used to cause the library to read an arbitrary file on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24422 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Script Security, Ocp Tools, Openshift | 2025-04-02 | 8.8 High |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability involving map constructors in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1228.vd93135a_2fb_25 and earlier allows attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0229 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2025-04-01 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in github.com/openshift/apiserver-library-go, used in OpenShift 4.12 and 4.11, that contains an issue that can allow low-privileged users to set the seccomp profile for pods they control to "unconfined." By default, the seccomp profile used in the restricted-v2 Security Context Constraint (SCC) is "runtime/default," allowing users to disable seccomp for pods they can create and modify. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56171 | 1 Redhat | 12 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Network Observ Optr and 9 more | 2025-03-28 | 7.8 High |
| libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a use-after-free in xmlSchemaIDCFillNodeTables and xmlSchemaBubbleIDCNodeTables in xmlschemas.c. To exploit this, a crafted XML document must be validated against an XML schema with certain identity constraints, or a crafted XML schema must be used. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43922 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 App Connect Enterprise Certified Container, Openshift | 2025-03-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 could disclose sensitive information to an attacker due to a weak hash of an API Key in the configuration. IBM X-Force ID: 241583. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1725 | 1 Redhat | 6 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Container Platform For Arm64 and 3 more | 2025-03-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the kubevirt-csi component of OpenShift Virtualization's Hosted Control Plane (HCP). This issue could allow an authenticated attacker to gain access to the root HCP worker node's volume by creating a custom Persistent Volume that matches the name of a worker node. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41731 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Watson Knowledge Catalog On Cloud Pak For Data, Openshift | 2025-03-25 | 8.6 High |
| IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog on Cloud Pak for Data 4.5.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 237402. | ||||
| CVE-2022-42439 | 4 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more | 6 Aix, App Connect Enterprise, App Connect Enterprise Certified Container and 3 more | 2025-03-25 | 6.8 Medium |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise 11.0.0.17 through 11.0.0.19 and 12.0.4.0 and 12.0.5.0 contains an unspecified vulnerability in the Discovery Connector nodes which may cause a 3rd party system’s credentials to be exposed to a privileged attacker. IBM X-Force ID: 238211. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0678 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 4 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2025-03-25 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in grub2. When reading data from a squash4 filesystem, grub's squash4 fs module uses user-controlled parameters from the filesystem geometry to determine the internal buffer size, however, it improperly checks for integer overflows. A maliciously crafted filesystem may lead some of those buffer size calculations to overflow, causing it to perform a grub_malloc() operation with a smaller size than expected. As a result, the direct_read() will perform a heap based out-of-bounds write during data reading. This flaw may be leveraged to corrupt grub's internal critical data and may result in arbitrary code execution, by-passing secure boot protections. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45782 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 4 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2025-03-25 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in the HFS filesystem. When reading an HFS volume's name at grub_fs_mount(), the HFS filesystem driver performs a strcpy() using the user-provided volume name as input without properly validating the volume name's length. This issue may read to a heap-based out-of-bounds writer, impacting grub's sensitive data integrity and eventually leading to a secure boot protection bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45779 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 3 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2025-03-25 | 6 Medium |
| An integer overflow flaw was found in the BFS file system driver in grub2. When reading a file with an indirect extent map, grub2 fails to validate the number of extent entries to be read. A crafted or corrupted BFS filesystem may cause an integer overflow during the file reading, leading to a heap of bounds read. As a consequence, sensitive data may be leaked, or grub2 will crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24928 | 1 Redhat | 12 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Network Observ Optr and 9 more | 2025-03-21 | 7.8 High |
| libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a stack-based buffer overflow in xmlSnprintfElements in valid.c. To exploit this, DTD validation must occur for an untrusted document or untrusted DTD. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2017-9047. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25725 | 3 Debian, Haproxy, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Haproxy, Ceph Storage and 3 more | 2025-03-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| HAProxy before 2.7.3 may allow a bypass of access control because HTTP/1 headers are inadvertently lost in some situations, aka "request smuggling." The HTTP header parsers in HAProxy may accept empty header field names, which could be used to truncate the list of HTTP headers and thus make some headers disappear after being parsed and processed for HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1. For HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, the impact is limited because the headers disappear before being parsed and processed, as if they had not been sent by the client. The fixed versions are 2.7.3, 2.6.9, 2.5.12, 2.4.22, 2.2.29, and 2.0.31. | ||||