Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Rhel Els
Subscriptions
Total
332 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-37536 | 4 Apache, Fedoraproject, Hcltech and 1 more | 4 Xerces-c\+\+, Fedora, Bigfix Platform and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 8.2 High |
| An integer overflow in xerces-c++ 3.2.3 in BigFix Platform allows remote attackers to cause out-of-bound access via HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3341 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 1 more | 9 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 6 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| The code that processes control channel messages sent to `named` calls certain functions recursively during packet parsing. Recursion depth is only limited by the maximum accepted packet size; depending on the environment, this may cause the packet-parsing code to run out of available stack memory, causing `named` to terminate unexpectedly. Since each incoming control channel message is fully parsed before its contents are authenticated, exploiting this flaw does not require the attacker to hold a valid RNDC key; only network access to the control channel's configured TCP port is necessary. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.2.0 through 9.16.43, 9.18.0 through 9.18.18, 9.19.0 through 9.19.16, 9.9.3-S1 through 9.16.43-S1, and 9.18.0-S1 through 9.18.18-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29214 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in UEFI firmware CseVariableStorageSmm for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28127 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10979 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 7 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-02-11 | 8.8 High |
| Incorrect control of environment variables in PostgreSQL PL/Perl allows an unprivileged database user to change sensitive process environment variables (e.g. PATH). That often suffices to enable arbitrary code execution, even if the attacker lacks a database server operating system user. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11187 | 1 Redhat | 8 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Ai and 5 more | 2025-02-11 | 7.5 High |
| It is possible to construct a zone such that some queries to it will generate responses containing numerous records in the Additional section. An attacker sending many such queries can cause either the authoritative server itself or an independent resolver to use disproportionate resources processing the queries. Zones will usually need to have been deliberately crafted to attack this exposure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.11.37, 9.16.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.32, 9.20.0 through 9.20.4, 9.21.0 through 9.21.3, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.11.37-S1, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.32-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53899 | 2 Redhat, Virtualenv | 8 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Devspaces, Rhel Aus and 5 more | 2025-02-10 | 8.4 High |
| virtualenv before 20.26.6 allows command injection through the activation scripts for a virtual environment. Magic template strings are not quoted correctly when replacing. NOTE: this is not the same as CVE-2024-9287. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1017 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 8 Firefox, Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-02-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 134, Thunderbird 134, Firefox ESR 128.6, and Thunderbird 128.6. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 135, Firefox ESR < 128.7, Thunderbird < 128.7, and Thunderbird < 135. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1014 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 8 Firefox, Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-02-06 | 8.8 High |
| Certificate length was not properly checked when added to a certificate store. In practice only trusted data was processed. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 135, Firefox ESR < 128.7, Thunderbird < 128.7, and Thunderbird < 135. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1012 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 8 Firefox, Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-02-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| A race during concurrent delazification could have led to a use-after-free. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 135, Firefox ESR < 115.20, Firefox ESR < 128.7, Thunderbird < 128.7, and Thunderbird < 135. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1011 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 8 Firefox, Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-02-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| A bug in WebAssembly code generation could have lead to a crash. It may have been possible for an attacker to leverage this to achieve code execution. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 135, Firefox ESR < 128.7, Thunderbird < 128.7, and Thunderbird < 135. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1010 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 8 Firefox, Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-02-06 | 9.8 Critical |
| An attacker could have caused a use-after-free via the Custom Highlight API, leading to a potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 135, Firefox ESR < 115.20, Firefox ESR < 128.7, Thunderbird < 128.7, and Thunderbird < 135. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41071 | 1 Redhat | 7 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 4 more | 2025-02-05 | 7.8 High |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48174 | 2 Busybox, Redhat | 2 Busybox, Rhel Els | 2025-02-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| There is a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c:6030 in busybox before 1.35. In the environment of Internet of Vehicles, this vulnerability can be executed from command to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46846 | 2 Redhat, Squid-cache | 13 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 and 10 more | 2025-01-27 | 9.3 Critical |
| SQUID is vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling, caused by chunked decoder lenience, allows a remote attacker to perform Request/Response smuggling past firewall and frontend security systems. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5753 | 14 Arm, Canonical, Debian and 11 more | 396 Cortex-a12, Cortex-a12 Firmware, Cortex-a15 and 393 more | 2025-01-14 | 5.6 Medium |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57823 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2025-01-10 | 9.3 Critical |
| In Raptor RDF Syntax Library through 2.0.16, there is an integer underflow when normalizing a URI with the turtle parser in raptor_uri_normalize_path(). | ||||
| CVE-2024-2201 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2025-01-09 | 4.7 Medium |
| A cross-privilege Spectre v2 vulnerability allows attackers to bypass all deployed mitigations, including the recent Fine(IBT), and to leak arbitrary Linux kernel memory on Intel systems. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45802 | 2 Redhat, Squid-cache | 7 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 4 more | 2025-01-03 | 7.5 High |
| Squid is an open source caching proxy for the Web supporting HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. Due to Input Validation, Premature Release of Resource During Expected Lifetime, and Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime bugs, Squid is vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks by a trusted server against all clients using the proxy. This bug is fixed in the default build configuration of Squid version 6.10. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56326 | 1 Redhat | 14 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2024-12-27 | 7.8 High |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5. | ||||