Total
2661 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-53787 | 1 Microsoft | 2 365, 365 Copilot | 2025-08-12 | 8.2 High |
| Microsoft 365 Copilot BizChat Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-53774 | 1 Microsoft | 2 365, 365 Copilot | 2025-08-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| Microsoft 365 Copilot BizChat Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-53773 | 2025-08-12 | 7.8 High | ||
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8823 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setDeviceName of the file /goform/setDeviceName. The manipulation of the argument DeviceName leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8818 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this issue is the function setDFSSetting of the file /goform/setLan. The manipulation of the argument lanNetmask/lanIp leads to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38120 | 1 Adtran | 2 Sr400ac, Sr400ac Firmware | 2025-08-12 | N/A |
| Adtran SR400ac ping Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Adtran SR400ac routers. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the ping command, which is available over JSON-RPC. A crafted host parameter can trigger execution of a system call composed from a user-supplied string. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. . Was ZDI-CAN-20525. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39471 | 1 Tp-link | 4 Tl-wr840n, Tl-wr840n Firmware, Tl-wr841n and 1 more | 2025-08-12 | 8.8 High |
| TP-Link TL-WR841N ated_tp Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of TP-Link TL-WR841N routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the ated_tp service. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21825. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8828 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected is the function ipv6cmd of the file /goform/setIpv6. The manipulation of the argument Ipv6PriDns/Ipv6SecDns/Ipv6StaticGateway/LanIpv6Addr/LanPrefixLen/pppoeUser/pppoePass/pppoeIdleTime/pppoeRedialPeriod/Ipv6in4_PrefixLen/LocalIpv6/RemoteIpv4/LanIPv6_Prefix/LanPrefixLen/ipv6to4Relay/ipv6rdRelay/tunrd_PrefixLen/wan_UseLinkLocal/Ipv6StaticIp/Ipv6PrefixLen leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8827 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. This issue affects the function um_inspect_cross_band of the file /goform/RP_setBasicAuto. The manipulation of the argument staticGateway leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8825 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. This affects the function RP_setBasicAuto of the file /goform/RP_setBasicAuto. The manipulation of the argument staticIp/staticNetmask leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8821 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. This issue affects the function RP_setBasic of the file /goform/RP_setBasic. The manipulation of the argument bssid leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8829 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this vulnerability is the function um_red of the file /goform/RP_setBasicAuto. The manipulation of the argument hname leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8752 | 1 Spring-shiro-training Project | 1 Spring-shiro-training | 2025-08-12 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in wangzhixuan spring-shiro-training up to 94812c1fd8f7fe796c931f4984ff1aa0671ab562. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /role/add. The manipulation leads to command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54393 | 1 Netwrix | 1 Directory Manager | 2025-08-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| Netwrix Directory Manager (formerly Imanami GroupID) 11.0.0.0 before 11.1.25162.02 allows Static Code Injection. Authenticated users can obtain administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8665 | 1 Agno-agi | 1 Agno | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in agno-agi agno up to 1.7.5. This issue affects the function MCPTools/MultiMCPTools in the library libs/agno/agno/tools/mcp.py of the component Model Context Protocol Handler. The manipulation of the argument command leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8667 | 1 Skyworkai | 1 Deepresearchagent | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in SkyworkAI DeepResearchAgent up to 08eb7f8eb9505d0094d75bb97ff7dacc3fa3bbf2. Affected is the function from_code/from_dict/from_mcp of the file src/tools/tools.py. The manipulation leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7769 | 1 Tigo Energy | 1 Cloud Connect Advanced | 2025-08-12 | N/A |
| Tigo Energy's CCA is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the /cgi-bin/mobile_api endpoint when the DEVICE_PING command is called, allowing remote code execution due to improper handling of user input. When used with default credentials, this enables attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the device that could cause potential unauthorized access, service disruption, and data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8830 | 1 Linksys | 6 Re6250, Re6300, Re6350 and 3 more | 2025-08-12 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 up to 20250801. Affected by this issue is the function sub_3517C of the file /goform/setWan. The manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1137 | 1 Ibm | 2 Spectrum Scale Container Native Storage Access, Storage Scale | 2025-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Storage Scale 5.2.2.0 and 5.2.2.1, under certain configurations, could allow an authenticated user to execute privileged commands due to improper input neutralization. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1292 | 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 4 more | 58 Debian Linux, Fedora, A250 and 55 more | 2025-08-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). | ||||