Filtered by vendor Tencent
Subscriptions
Total
31 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-11046 | 1 Tencent | 1 Weknora | 2025-09-29 | 7.3 High |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases". | ||||
| CVE-2024-34408 | 1 Tencent | 1 Libpag | 2025-09-19 | 5.3 Medium |
| Tencent libpag through 4.3.51 has an integer overflow in DecodeStream::checkEndOfFile() in codec/utils/DecodeStream.cpp via a crafted PAG (Portable Animated Graphics) file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33078 | 1 Tencent | 1 Libpag | 2025-09-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Tencent Libpag v4.3 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. A user can send a crafted image to trigger a overflow leading to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38517 | 1 Tencent | 1 Rapidjson | 2025-07-12 | 6.8 Medium |
| Tencent RapidJSON is vulnerable to privilege escalation due to an integer underflow in the `GenericReader::ParseNumber()` function of `include/rapidjson/reader.h` when parsing JSON text from a stream. An attacker needs to send the victim a crafted file which needs to be opened; this triggers the integer underflow vulnerability (when the file is parsed), leading to elevation of privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39684 | 1 Tencent | 1 Rapidjson | 2025-07-12 | 6.8 Medium |
| Tencent RapidJSON is vulnerable to privilege escalation due to an integer overflow in the `GenericReader::ParseNumber()` function of `include/rapidjson/reader.h` when parsing JSON text from a stream. An attacker needs to send the victim a crafted file which needs to be opened; this triggers the integer overflow vulnerability (when the file is parsed), leading to elevation of privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22873 | 1 Tencent | 1 Blueking Configuration Management Database | 2025-06-09 | 8.1 High |
| Tencent Blueking CMDB v3.2.x to v3.9.x was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the event subscription function (/service/subscription.go). This vulnerability allows attackers to access internal requests via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2021-27439 | 1 Tencent | 1 Tencentos-tiny | 2025-04-16 | 7.3 High |
| TencentOS-tiny version 3.1.0 is vulnerable to integer wrap-around in function 'tos_mmheap_alloc incorrect calculation of effective memory allocation size. This improper memory assignment can lead to arbitrary memory allocation, resulting in unexpected behavior such as a crash or a remote code injection/execution. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4865 | 2 Google, Tencent | 3 Android, Microblogpad, Wblog | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Tencent WBlog (com.tencent.WBlog) 3.3.1 and MicroBlogPad 1.4.0 applications for Android do not properly protect data, which allows remote attackers to read or modify message drafts and search keywords via a crafted application. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4867 | 2 Android, Tencent | 2 Android, Qqpphoto | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Tencent QQPhoto (com.tencent.qqphoto) application 0.97 for Android does not properly protect data, which allows remote attackers to read or modify contact information and a password hash via a crafted application. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4863 | 2 Google, Tencent | 2 Android, Qqpimsecure | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Tencent QQPimSecure (com.tencent.qqpimsecure) application 3.0.2 for Android does not properly protect data, which allows remote attackers to read or modify SMS/MMS messages and a contact list via a crafted application. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4864 | 2 Google, Tencent | 2 Android, Mobileqq | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Tencent MobileQQ (com.tencent.mobileqq) application 2.2 for Android does not properly protect data, which allows remote attackers to read or modify messages and a friends list via a crafted application. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30363 | 1 Tencent | 1 Vconsole | 2025-02-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| vConsole v3.15.0 was discovered to contain a prototype pollution due to incorrect key and value resolution in setOptions in core.ts. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34312 | 1 Tencent | 2 Qq, Tim | 2025-01-09 | 7.8 High |
| In Tencent QQ through 9.7.8.29039 and TIM through 3.4.7.22084, QQProtect.exe and QQProtectEngine.dll do not validate pointers from inter-process communication, which leads to a write-what-where condition. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40433 | 1 Tencent | 1 Wechat | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Tencent wechat v.8.0.37 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the web-view component. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52286 | 1 Tencent | 1 Tencent Distributed Sql | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Tencent tdsqlpcloud through 1.8.5 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to discover database credentials via an index.php/api/install/get_db_info request, a related issue to CVE-2023-42387. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40829 | 1 Tencent | 1 Enterprise Wechat Privatization | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| There is an interface unauthorized access vulnerability in the background of Tencent Enterprise Wechat Privatization 2.5.x and 2.6.930000. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39988 | 1 Tencent | 1 Wxsync | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Auth. (contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in 标准云(std.Cloud) WxSync plugin <= 2.7.23 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35158 | 1 Tencent | 1 Tscancode | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted lua script. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40180 | 1 Tencent | 1 Wechat | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In the WeChat application 8.0.10 for Android and iOS, a mini program can obtain sensitive information from a user's address book via wx.searchContacts. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33879 | 1 Tencent | 1 Gameloop | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| Tencent GameLoop before 4.1.21.90 downloaded updates over an insecure HTTP connection. A malicious attacker in an MITM position could spoof the contents of an XML document describing an update package, replacing a download URL with one pointing to an arbitrary Windows executable. Because the only integrity check would be a comparison of the downloaded file's MD5 checksum to the one contained within the XML document, the downloaded executable would then be executed on the victim's machine. | ||||