Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Satellite Capsule
Subscriptions
Total
286 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-10622 | 1 Redhat | 4 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Satellite Maintenance and 1 more | 2025-11-06 | 8 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Satellite (Foreman component). This vulnerability allows an authenticated user with edit_settings permissions to achieve arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system via insufficient server-side validation of command whitelisting. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50471 | 2 Davegamble, Redhat | 3 Cjson, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| cJSON v1.7.16 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function cJSON_InsertItemInArray at cJSON.c. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28219 | 3 Debian, Python, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Pillow, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 6.7 Medium |
| In _imagingcms.c in Pillow before 10.3.0, a buffer overflow exists because strcpy is used instead of strncpy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27351 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.25, 4.2 before 4.2.11, and 5.0 before 5.0.3, the django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and the truncatewords_html template filter are subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack via a crafted string. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24680 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.24, 4.2 before 4.2.10, and Django 5.0 before 5.0.2. The intcomma template filter was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49082 | 2 Aiohttp, Redhat | 5 Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP method. The vulnerability occurs only if the attacker can control the HTTP method (GET, POST etc.) of the request. If the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request it will be able to modify the request (request smuggling). This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49081 | 2 Aiohttp, Redhat | 5 Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation made it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. to insert a new header) or create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP version. The vulnerability only occurs if the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request. This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43665 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.22, 4.1 before 4.1.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.6, the django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41164 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.21, 4.1 before 4.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.5, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri() is subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36053 | 4 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 8 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora and 5 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.20, 4 before 4.1.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.3, EmailValidator and URLValidator are subject to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) attack via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42005 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. QuerySet.values() and values_list() methods on models with a JSONField are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted JSON object key as a passed *arg. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41991 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters, and the AdminURLFieldWidget widget, are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39614 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. get_supported_language_variant() was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39330 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class, when they override generate_filename() without replicating the file-path validations from the parent class, potentially allow directory traversal via certain inputs during a save() call. (Built-in Storage sub-classes are unaffected.) | ||||
| CVE-2024-39329 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. The django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method allows remote attackers to enumerate users via a timing attack involving login requests for users with an unusable password. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38875 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.14 and 5.0 before 5.0.7. urlize and urlizetrunc were subject to a potential denial of service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of brackets. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29970 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Sinatrarb | 7 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 4 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| Sinatra before 2.2.0 does not validate that the expanded path matches public_dir when serving static files. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27610 | 2 Rack, Redhat | 4 Rack, Logging, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| Rack provides an interface for developing web applications in Ruby. Prior to versions 2.2.13, 3.0.14, and 3.1.12, `Rack::Static` can serve files under the specified `root:` even if `urls:` are provided, which may expose other files under the specified `root:` unexpectedly. The vulnerability occurs because `Rack::Static` does not properly sanitize user-supplied paths before serving files. Specifically, encoded path traversal sequences are not correctly validated, allowing attackers to access files outside the designated static file directory. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can gain access to all files under the specified `root:` directory, provided they are able to determine then path of the file. Versions 2.2.13, 3.0.14, and 3.1.12 contain a patch for the issue. Other mitigations include removing usage of `Rack::Static`, or ensuring that `root:` points at a directory path which only contains files which should be accessed publicly. It is likely that a CDN or similar static file server would also mitigate the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4340 | 1 Redhat | 5 Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34064 | 3 Fedoraproject, Palletsprojects, Redhat | 12 Fedora, Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform and 9 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.4. | ||||